Book Reviews of 361 (Hard Case Crime)

361 (Hard Case Crime)
361 - Hard Case Crime
Author: Donald E. Westlake
ISBN-13: 9780843953572
ISBN-10: 0843953578
Publication Date: 5/3/2005
Pages: 207
  • Currently 3.4/5 Stars.

3.4 stars, based on 34 ratings
Publisher: Hard Case Crime
Book Type: Mass Market Paperback
Reviews: Amazon | Write a Review

4 Book Reviews submitted by our Members...sorted by voted most helpful

reviewed 361 (Hard Case Crime) on + 170 more book reviews
Helpful Score: 2
From Booklist
Ray Kelly musters out of the air force and meets his father in New York City; on the drive upstate, Ray's dad is shot dead at the wheel. Now that's a first chapter! Recovering from his own injuries, Ray discovers that his brother Bill's wife has been killed, too. Someone is out to get the family, but why? Ray and Bill return to the city and start digging, finding some truly twisty answers. This tale of a revenge-obsessed son qualifies as a respectable rediscovery. Random House published a hardcover in 1962, and aside from a British paperback and a couple of translations, it's been out of print ever since. The title, 361, refers to the numbered entry in Roget's Thesaurus for "Destruction of life; violent death," which sounds like the title a pulp publisher picks when he has run out of ideas. But it's ironic, because this early effort (which hints at the humor Westlake would later develop) boasts the classic hard-boiled style: prose so clean it's like Hemingway threw away his thesaurus. Well worth an evening.
reviewed 361 (Hard Case Crime) on + 29 more book reviews
Helpful Score: 1
pretty good. Donald westlake tends to be pretty humerous at times. I don't read many crime stories but his I find pretty entertaining. This one is about a man out for revenge for his father's killer.
reviewed 361 (Hard Case Crime) on + 47 more book reviews
So-so pulp thriller from 1962. Brothers search for their fathers killers, encounter surprises. Fast paced and hard-boiled. TPB
reviewed 361 (Hard Case Crime) on + 144 more book reviews decide on this one. Not my style.