Skip to main content
PBS logo
 
 

Discussion Forums - Fantasy

Topic: Avatar

Club rule - Please, if you cannot be courteous and respectful, do not post in this forum.
  Unlock Forum posting with Annual Membership.
Generic Profile avatar
Standard Member medalFriend of PBS-Gold medalPBS Blog Contributor medal
Subject: Avatar
Date Posted: 2/22/2010 2:11 PM ET
Member Since: 5/31/2009
Posts: 4,939
Back To Top


Last Edited on: 9/23/10 1:09 PM ET - Total times edited: 2
gnombient avatar
Date Posted: 2/23/2010 5:18 PM ET
Member Since: 5/17/2006
Posts: 50
Back To Top

I thought it was definitely a dazzling and entertaining spectacle, but there isn't much substance behind the curtain to keep me coming back to the well for more.  Unoriginal visual design, second-rate planetary romance plot, boring neoromantic "epic" soundtrack... 

peculiarbookworm avatar
Amy
Friend of PBS-Gold medal
Date Posted: 2/23/2010 11:53 PM ET
Member Since: 3/11/2008
Posts: 1,986
Back To Top

I liked this movie, but I don't understand the hype behind it.

anncc avatar
Standard Member medal
Date Posted: 2/24/2010 7:11 AM ET
Member Since: 9/3/2008
Posts: 484
Back To Top

I enjoyed avatar a lot.  I think the main hype was the graphics & 3d not necessarily the story -at least that's how I interpreted it.   They were fantastic.   A couple of people (either in sci fi or in fantasy forum) suggested it had a very similar plotline to Fern Gully and I totally agree.

donnatella avatar
Friend of PBS-Silver medal
Date Posted: 2/24/2010 7:29 AM ET
Member Since: 6/26/2006
Posts: 6,633
Back To Top

Haven't seen it, don't really want to. 

Catspaw avatar
Date Posted: 2/26/2010 4:32 PM ET
Member Since: 7/14/2007
Posts: 8,942
Back To Top

I loved the visuals, but the plot seemed pretty hackneyed, and the characters were IMO, without nuance or depth.

Generic Profile avatar
Date Posted: 3/21/2010 12:46 AM ET
Member Since: 11/27/2007
Posts: 126
Back To Top

As an actor and a bit of a movie geek, I liked Avatar and enjoyed it a lot, but certainly don't think it's a revelation and don't think it should have been anywhere near the Best Picture race. The visuals are amazing, and the acting wasn't bad (I especially liked Sigourney Weaver, but when isn't she good?), but Best Picture contender? Really? Personally, I think the acting, script, and directing in Sherlock Holmes was miles better than in Avatar, and I still don't think Sherlock Holmes should be nominated for Best Picture.

bengal77 avatar
Date Posted: 3/22/2010 8:05 PM ET
Member Since: 9/29/2009
Posts: 2,551
Back To Top

"  A couple of people (either in sci fi or in fantasy forum) suggested it had a very similar plotline to Fern Gully and I totally agree."

Actually it's pretty much Dances with Wolves in space with blue cats. I really enjoyed it, though. The visuals were absolutely stunning. I saw it twice in theaters and will probably buy the DVD when it comes out.

Generic Profile avatar
Date Posted: 3/26/2010 1:28 PM ET
Member Since: 8/17/2009
Posts: 1,588
Back To Top

Dances with Wolves ... or Pocahontas.  Did you see this?  Nails it.

http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/3867/poca2u.jpg

Personally, I was quite disappointed.  I've enjoyed ALL of Cameron's prior movies, and I expected more, substantively, from this one, to ago along with the fabulous CGI.  I thought the CGI was wasted on such a poor story.

Generic Profile avatar
Date Posted: 4/26/2010 7:04 PM ET
Member Since: 2/5/2009
Posts: 30
Back To Top

LoL, I personally thought it was a braveheart + pochahontas hybrid.  They are blue, THIS IS OUR LAND, everything else is Pocahontas.

Story is competely unoriginal.  The graphics were amazing and the technology they used to film is revolutionary, but the storyline is pretty standard.  Not worth the hype imo... not buying the blueray.  I still value story over the visual stimulation.



Last Edited on: 4/26/10 7:04 PM ET - Total times edited: 1