Skip to main content
PBS logo
 
 

Search - National Audubon Society Regional Guide to the Southeastern States : Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South ... Field Guide to the Southeastern States)

National Audubon Society Regional Guide to the Southeastern States : Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South ... Field Guide to the Southeastern States)
National Audubon Society Regional Guide to the Southeastern States Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina South Field Guide to the Southeastern States
Author: Brian Cassie, Gil Nelson, Harry Zirlin, Jonathan D. W. Kahl, Eirc A. Oches, Wendy B. Zomlefer
Filled with concise descriptions and stunning photographs, the National Audubon Society Field Guide to the Southeastern States belongs in the home of every resident of the Southeast and in the suitcase or backpack of every visitor.  This compact volume contains: — An easy-to-use field guide for identifying 1,000 of the state's wi...  more »
ISBN-13: 9780679446835
ISBN-10: 0679446834
Publication Date: 9/28/1999
Pages: 448
Rating:
  • Currently 3.3/5 Stars.
 2

3.3 stars, based on 2 ratings
Publisher: Knopf
Book Type: Turtleback
Members Wishing: 9
Reviews: Member | Amazon | Write a Review
Read All 1 Book Reviews of "National Audubon Society Regional Guide to the Southeastern States Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina South Field Guide to the Southeastern States"

Please Log in to Rate these Book Reviews

imapuma avatar reviewed National Audubon Society Regional Guide to the Southeastern States : Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South ... Field Guide to the Southeastern States) on
Nice pictures on a wide range of topics. Details on covered species are minimal and only a small fraction of species are covered. Not very well/logically organized in many places. It depends on what you want it for, but not very helpful as a field guide which would require better organization and search-ability as well as the vast majority of species. I think they undertook to cover too much in one volume and ended up covering nothing very well. Could be useful as general knowledge enhancement for the topics and species covered.


Genres: