Search -
An Analysis of GPS Navigation Solutions for Shuttle Mission STS-69
An Analysis of GPS Navigation Solutions for Shuttle Mission STS69 Author:James T. Jones This is a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA report procured by the Pentagon and made available for public release. It has been reproduced in the best form available to the Pentagon. It is not spiral-bound, but rather assembled with Velobinding in a soft, white linen cover. The Storming Media report number is A107813. The abstract provided by... more » the Pentagon follows: The NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) has provided a quantum leap in real-time autonomous navigation capabilities. NASA's Space Shuttle will be receiving an integrated GPS capability in the near future, and the orbiter Endeavour has been equipped with a stand-alone GPS receiver. Although much data is available regarding spacecraft GPS receiver performance at higher altitudes, little information is available for spacecraft at Shuttle altitudes of approximately 400 km where drag and gravity effects are more pronounced GPS receiver navigation solution data from Shuttle mission STS-69 was made available by NASA and provided an opportunity for evaluating GPS performance in low Earth orbit. NASA ground tracking network and Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) data for this mission provided a reference for comparison. Analysis of the data was accomplished using Satellite Tool Kit (STK) for visualization and Matlab routines for data comparison. GPS navigation solutions were available for approximately 63 percent of the STS-69 mission, and they generally coincided with the reference track. Differences between the GPS navigation solution state vectors obtained using the Standard Positioning Service (SPS) and the reference state vectors produced RMS position differences between the data sets of about 1500 m. One sigma position accuracies of 54 m in the vertical direction and approximately 1400 m in the downtrack direction were experienced. Velocity vector magnitude differences during this period were generally + or - 1m/s, with a RMS velocity difference of less than 9 m/s.« less