Search - Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives

Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives
Denialism How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives
Author: Michael Specter
In this provocative and headline- making book, Michael Specter confronts the widespread fear of science and its terrible toll on individuals and the planet. — In Denialism, New Yorker staff writer Michael Specter reveals that Americans have come to mistrust institutions and especially the institution of science more today than ever ...  more »
The Market's bargain prices are even better for Paperbackswap club members!
Retail Price: $27.95
Buy New (Hardcover): $6.59 (save 76%) or
Become a PBS member and pay $2.69+1 PBS book credit (save 90%)
ISBN-13: 9781594202308
ISBN-10: 1594202303
Publication Date: 10/29/2009
Pages: 304
Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
 4

3 stars, based on 4 ratings
Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The
Book Type: Hardcover
Other Versions: Paperback
Members Wishing: 57
Reviews: Member | Amazon | Write a Review
Similar books to this author and title:
Members who requested this book also requested:

Top Member Book Reviews

  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
reviewed Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives on + 489 more book reviews
1 member(s) found this review helpful.
I find it difficult to know what to think about this book. In many ways, it's a must-read if you agree that irrationality runs rampant today. Hot-button issues concerning large pharmaceutical companies, childhood vaccines, or even the origin of the lettuce in your salad can generate torrents of heated debate and floods of mis- and dis- information and personal anecdotes, but very little of actual value. Specter discusses this disturbing lack of regard for hard science, and writes clearly about picking our way through these complex, often frightening, issues. But I would have found the book more convincing if he had been able to set aside his personal (and very blatant) political leanings and instead make the case for real science stand on its own merits. As it is, he falls prey to his own form of denialism when he fails to maintain the objectivity that would reinforce his credibility.


Genres: