|Unlock Forum posting with Annual Membership.|
Does anyone else have this collection or at least the list ? I've been trying for a few years to read some as I can. I skip around about what i read depending on my mood.
Right now I'm reading "On Liberty" by John Stuart Mill. Interesting reading!
Well I'd love to, but I'm ashamed to say that I can only claim to have read the following:
One deck to read:
Part of the Iliad
The United States Documents
Part of The Federalist
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill
Hedda Gabbler by Ibsen
Experience and Education by John Dewey
A Lost Lady by Willa Cather
To The Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
Metamorphosis by Kafka (that was just weird, didn't get much out of it)
The Prussian Officer by Lawrence
The Great Gatsby by Fitzgerald
A Rose for Emily by Faulkner
The Short Happy Life of Macomber by Hemingway
Some of the ones I'm considering next are:
Pragmatism by William James
An Introduction to Mathematics by A.N. Whitehead
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by Joyce
Let's see, I've read...
Going to read...
Some criticisms besides the noted ones where I'd have selected another work by the author... there's an awful lot of philosophy & other non-fiction works, but it seems a lot of great works of fiction are left off (Hawthorne, Poe, Brontes, Arthur Miller, Dumas, O. Henry, Tennesse Williams, etc) also classics like Beowulf, and Ovid's Metamorphoses. Also some really enjoyable ones like Bram Stoker, Conan Doyle, Tolkien, Ray Bradbury & Lewis Carroll. Also why is there hardly any poetry included? So those are my criticisms, but there's an awful lot of interesting stuff on the list.
I also wonder about some of their choices for certain authors. Other lists you see of great books to read list different options for authors like Jane Austen. I don't have the introduction handy but I know they do talk about why some famous works were left out. If memory serves me correctly it has to do with the works all tying together and perhaps they didn't think they could tie Beowulf in with the rest (shrugging my shoulders). Also, I think in they introduction the compilers do say they are not saying these are all of the great works but it is a starting place.
Yeah, it seemed more like "Great Classical works with some other modern stuff also included" since there was such a heavy concentration on classical literature (which is fine, but does exclude a lot of important stuff). And I keep thinking of even classical literature that they didn't include, like besides missing Ovid, they're also missing Suetonius' 12 Caesars which I think is one of the best classical works, although perhaps not as important as Plato's Republic, but much more fun.
I found this from Adler
As I have recently written elsewhere, the adjective "great" in the phrase "great books" derives its primary meaning from its use in the phrase "great ideas." There are many other criteria by which people make up diverse lists of the books they wish to honor by calling them "great books." But from the primary significance of the adjustive "great" as applied to the great ideas is derived the significance of that adjective as used in the phrase, "the great conversation."
In other words, we chose the great books on the basis of their relevance to at least 25 of the 102 great ideas. Many of the great books are relevant to a much larger number of the 102 great ideas, as many as 75 or more great ideas, a few to all 102 great ideas. In sharp contrast are the good books that are relevant to less than 10 or even as few as 4 or 5 great ideas. We placed such books in the lists of Recommended Readings to be found in the last section in each of the 102 chapters of the "Syntopicon." Here readers will find many twentieth-century female authors, black authors, and Latin American authors whose works we recommended but did not include in the second edition of the Great Books.