Skip to main content
PBS logo
 
 

Discussion Forums - Classic Literature

Topic: January Book of the Month: Hound of the Baskervilles

Club rule - Please, if you cannot be courteous and respectful, do not post in this forum.
  Unlock Forum posting with Annual Membership.
mickmckeown avatar
Friend of PBS-Silver medal
Subject: January Book of the Month: Hound of the Baskervilles
Date Posted: 1/25/2010 9:52 PM ET
Member Since: 9/20/2008
Posts: 402
Back To Top

I hope everyone enjoyed the Hound of the Baskervilles. For me I found it to be a great read. What are your thoughts on the novella? Compared to the short stories how does Watson's role seem in this story? Better/Worse? Please feel free to weigh in. Looking forward to everyone's responses.

Generic Profile avatar
Subject: My Review
Date Posted: 1/26/2010 11:57 AM ET
Member Since: 3/27/2009
Posts: 25,000
Back To Top

This is the first Holmes mystery I've ever read. It takes a chapter or two to settle into Doyle's 19th century, purple-ish prose, but after that the thrill of the mystery begins.

I say and by jove, Holmes certainly is a conceited character and poor lackey Watson...well...let's just say that Jude Law's boxing version of Dr. Watson in the new Sherlock Holmes film finally gives Holmes the solid punch in the nose that he so deserves. Holmes is a condescending ass at times.

Hound of the Baskervilles, of course, is a classic whodunit that all mystery fans should read at least once. Doyle does a fine job of creating a the perfect gothic backdrop: The gloomy moor, the unpredictable foggy shroud, the treacherous Grimpen Mire, a boggy/swamp that is hell bent on swallowing any living thing that crosses its path, mysterious midnight howling and screams, the dark and creepy Baskerville manor, the moon herself plays an active role here too.

The Baskerville legend seems lame however, but one goes along with it for the thrill of letting old Holmes showcase his talent once more.

A great read."

 

Lambie avatar
Limited Member medal
Date Posted: 1/26/2010 12:53 PM ET
Member Since: 6/29/2008
Posts: 27,031
Back To Top

I've never read Sherlock Holmes before because I didn't like his conceited attitude.  I think I liked the Hounds because
it was told from Watson's viewpoint with very little of Holmes actually in it.

amerigo avatar
Date Posted: 1/28/2010 6:55 PM ET
Member Since: 8/13/2009
Posts: 298
Back To Top

I really enjoyed the atmospherics in The Hound of the Baskervilles.

In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Watson is more than just an admirer of Holmes' forensic techniques and crime-solving skills, recording them for posterity.  He is part of the investigation and essential to piecing the story together for readers.  He readily steps up to Holmes' show of confidence in his abilities and does a great job.  

However, I must admit I thought the resemblance to Stapleton that Holmes found in the portrait contrived and unconvincing.



Last Edited on: 1/28/10 6:56 PM ET - Total times edited: 1
Hildy avatar
Date Posted: 2/21/2010 9:14 AM ET
Member Since: 4/25/2007
Posts: 54
Back To Top

I read Hound for the first time as a young teen, and I've had crush on Sherlock Holmes ever since.  Sure, he's kind of conceited, but, as my mother used to say, it ain't bragging if you can do it.  I like Watson-as-narrator more in Hound than in most of the other stories.  He's often considered Holmes's bumbling sidekick, but he was a combat-wounded war vet.  He was a brave, vigorous guy.