Discussion Forums - Historical Fiction

Topic: Outlander newbie question

Club rule - Please, if you cannot be courteous and respectful, do not post in this forum.
  Unlock Forum posting with Annual Membership.
Subject: Outlander newbie question
Date Posted: 4/9/2010 1:35 PM ET
Member Since: 2/25/2007
Posts: 13,991
Back To Top

Help! I'm about halfway through the first "Outlander" book. It's fine, but other than at the very first, where the heroine travels back in time, it seems like pure historical fiction. I expected more fantasy---more magic, more magical creatures, etc., so far there is nothing like that.

Does any fantasy appear later, in this book or others? Or is it more pure historical fiction?

Date Posted: 4/9/2010 1:57 PM ET
Member Since: 7/15/2008
Posts: 4,035
Back To Top

IIRC, the time travel becomes more frequent in the latter books.

Date Posted: 4/9/2010 2:44 PM ET
Member Since: 3/14/2009
Posts: 9,175
Back To Top

Loch Ness Monster, make an appearence,  

Date Posted: 4/9/2010 2:49 PM ET
Member Since: 1/12/2008
Posts: 1,356
Back To Top

all true, but I think it's most HF as opposed to fantasy and magic...

Date Posted: 4/9/2010 3:00 PM ET
Member Since: 8/17/2009
Posts: 1,588
Back To Top

It's more historical fiction; time travel is the only element could be termed fantasy. 

Date Posted: 4/9/2010 8:25 PM ET
Member Since: 12/10/2005
Posts: 2,851
Back To Top

Agree re the Loch Ness scene. I'm not even sure why she put that in there. It kinda took me outta the story for a moment. But just a moment. Loved it otherwise.

It's definitely more HF than fantasy.

Date Posted: 4/10/2010 11:44 AM ET
Member Since: 8/17/2009
Posts: 1,588
Back To Top

It did me, too.  But the idea that the explanation for Nessie is there's was a timeslip spot at the bottom of the lake, and it  keeps going back and forth between prehistoric times and ours, is amusing enough that I liked it.