Read this for my book club and it sparked a lot of discussion. While some (like me) really liked it, others did not, but that didn't diminish the discussion. Isn't that what good literature does....evoke a variety of responses and opinions. This book while short in length and compact in story is full of ideas that deserve discussing.
I read this book because I'm working my way through books that have won the man booker award as a sort of book project. I usually love books that are introspective but this one left me with a sour memory.
It was written in an utterly pretentious way with none of the depth that the writer was obviously hoping and desperately attempting to instill into the book. None of the characters were likeable or even relate able because they in no way connected with each other.
Yes it's a short book and I did read the whole thing but only out of curiosity as to why exactly this book was awarded anything. Seems to me there were many other more deserving contenders in 2011 that should have beaten this pretentious opaque pile of paper.
My bookclub read this book, and it was interesting to see all the theories and speculation about the characters' motivations that were expressed in the discussion. It can be read in one sitting, but it feels as if you've read a much longer book due to its depth. To me it's like an older person's Catcher in the Rye. I liked it!
No thanks, this reads like something an angrey English Professor would have MADE me read in college. It could not grab my attention at all and despite its short number of pages, I could get through the first 30!
A fast, suspenseful read with involving characters that comes together in the last couple of pages. Highly recommended.