Page: Unlock Forum posting with Annual Membership. |
|
|||
I don't understand the point of making Tag lines that individuals put on books viewable by everyone. Most of them say really dumb things or have no meaning to anyone other than the person who put them there. We already know about the books by the blurb, the reviews and the title. If we want more we can Google the book or the author. Personal tags that only are visible to the person who put them there, ok, I can understand. Someone might want to tag, "Uncle Bob loved this and thinks I might, too" or some such. But why does everyone else on the list care that someone put a tag like, "cowboys and indians" under a Zane Grey novel, for example?
Claudia |
|||
|
|||
I want to know what the tag "done" means. "First in series", "Cozy"....these make sense to me. Done? Um...good for you? Congratulations? I don't get it.
|
|||
|
|||
Done makes sense to me - it's someone's way of keeping track of what they've already read. |
|||
|
|||
What are they?Book Tags allow you to mark books any way you like.
Why do I want to use them?
Will others be able to see my tags?
How do I use the Tags?To add a tag to a book:
To remove a tag you have placed on a book:
To see the tags that have been applied to a book:
Is there anything else I should know about the Tags?Just a few things we can think of right now:
|
|||
|
|||
Well someone else could click on that Cowboys and Indians tags and see what other books have that tag. They might find an author they've never heard of and decide to try them. Prompting them to order a book and spend a credit in the system. |
|||
|
|||
"Done"="I've read this book". All righty then.
|
|||
|
|||
I totally get what LeeAnne is saying, I think that many people forget that tags are able to be seen by everyone. The example of Cowboy makes sense to me - I can search by that and find new authors. But, why on earth would I want to search by books that someone else has finished? |
|||
|
|||
Why would I care if someone else is done with a book? Does it mean that book was a chore to read? ;-) I know it shouldn't be annoying, but it is. A review, I could understand. Something like, "This book has stolen the plot from Peter Pan"... ok, that's good to know. But "done"? "J2"? "RLB"? What if we all just started posting our own random tags? It makes no sense. Claudia
|
|||
|
|||
But, why on earth would I want to search by books that someone else has finished? You probably wouldn't. But, it's a personal tag. That person can click on that tag and instantly pull up a list of all the books they've read. I have one going for books I've read so far in '08. I want to keep track, and that's an easy way to do it. ETA: personal tags get pushed to the bottom where you won't even see them....IF enough relevant to everyone tags are listed. The only way this can happen is if more people start tagging books. Last Edited on: 1/18/08 12:31 PM ET - Total times edited: 1 |
|||
|
|||
Isn't it easier to use your "Books I've Read" list?
|
|||
|
|||
If the personal tags are bothering you that much, start making useful tags to push them to the back. Personally I don't even notice the tags anymore except for the ones I've made. That red x catches my attention but the tag itself usually just blends in with the rest of the info. I've tagged my RL books. I've found it really helpful while looking at deals in Book Bazaar. I'll peruse their offer and see that I can get 2 or 3 of my RL books for a credit. I can't remember them all. I've started tagging my TBR books too since I can't remember which I own already. I make a lot of useful tags to help offset my personal ones. |
|||
|
|||
See that's just it, is that there should be two sets of tags - personal that only you see, and then for the entire PBS. It could be a good system, but because there are personal tags in there, it becomes clutter, in my opinion.
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, then, I'm thinking about this. What if I name books after my pets. Bubba = old but sweet, a little overweight. (14 year old coon hound) -this would be for books that are comfortable Daisy = wild but loving (a rescue) - this would be for really good, can't-put-it-down reads. Patsy = Stinker (she's a basset, very loving, but I CANNOT get rid of that smell.) - This is for STINKERS! Tiger = a very fat cat who sleeps all the time - this is for books that are SLOW Momma-kitty = bad hip, cross-eyed - this would be for books about damaged people (I seem to read a lot of those) Frankie = wild cat about town - this would be for things like Stephanie Plum books Henny-Penny = this is a practical chicken, a good layer - this would be for non-fiction books Dovey = beautiful small, pearlescent gray banty, dreamy - this would be for books that speculate about reality (I seem to read a lot of these, too.) It makes about as much sense as the other tags. |
|||
|
|||
Personally I don't even notice the tags anymore except for the ones I've made. That red x catches my attention but the tag itself usually just blends in with the rest of the info. That's exactly it, because so many are personal, I don't notice them at all - I just consider them part of the "clutter" about the book (like how long it is) |
|||
|
|||
Isn't it easier to use your "Books I've Read" list? In theory, probably. But, when I first joined I posted a whole lot of books that automatically went onto my books I've read list (cause I forgot to tell it not to). I hadn't actually read all those books and at that point it was too hard to go back and figure out which I did and which I didn't. |
|||
|
|||
Keep in mind..tags are NOT for you..they are for them (the poster). It's like putting your books into file folders. |
|||
|
|||
Tags are pretty useless here, even for your own use. Unless you can sort by your own tag system and search for them, they have very little use (to me). I've been cataloging my books over at LibraryThing for just this purpose. If I could do it here, I wouldn't have to use other sites. |
|||
|
|||
The tagging system is still new here. As more and more people add useful tags the personal ones will become less noticeable. They aren't going to put the tagging system. So instead of complaining about them, start making useful tags. Then the personal ones will only show up to the person who made them. You don't have to come up with new tags. Just retag with the more commone one that's already there. That'll bring that tag up to the forefront. |
|||
|
|||
I want to know what the tag "done" means. Maybe they couldn't stand it any more and put it in the oven and baked it until the meat thermometer read "Well Done"? |
|||
|
|||
But if you tagged books that way Claudia it would make PERFECT sense to you! And that is what part of this is intended for. If it doesn't make sense to me - then I would skip it. I know others are of a different opinion, but there are other parts of PBS I don't use. What is clutter to some is helpful to others. |
|||
|
|||
I'm assuming Done is someone's version of "read". They're tagging the books they've read so they don't accidentally order it again. I've bought books that look good at the UBS and then realized I've read it already after I've gotten it home. |
|||
|
|||
I have NO idea what the tag "DONE" means but there are 7,109 books marked DONE - so it must mean a lot to a lot of people. I DO wish they'd clue us in. lol |
|||
|
|||
I was just reading this thread and have a question. If I start tagging the books I read as "Read in 2008", and someone else uses the same tag for their 2008 books, will I get only my books when I search on that tag? Or will I get the books of everyone who used that tag? |
|||
|
|||
You'll get the books everyone tagged. But yours will have a little red X. Like that Done tag that's been used like 7,000 times. I know 1 person didn't read 7,000 books. Although I supposed it's possible. I think people mostly use those for when their browsing peoples shelves they can see that they've read that book already. Handy for people like me who read a lot and have a habit of rebuying books and then realizing they've read it already. |
|||
|
|||
If you want the "Read in 2008" to be for just your books, then put "Read in 2008 RM" so that only yours will come up. Tho personally, I use all 3 of my initials so that it is less likely to be used by someone else. Robin Masters or such could as easily be doing the same thing to his books, and you two would get confused, but if your middle initial was L, and his was W and you both used all 3, then your books would be distinctly marked as "Read in 2008 RLM" and "Read in 2008 RWM" |
|||
Page: |