Search -
Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program Phase I. Volume 1: Needs Analysis
Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program Phase I Volume 1 Needs Analysis Author:Roy C. Campbell, Deirdre J. Knapp This is a HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION ALEXANDRIA VA report procured by the Pentagon and made available for public release. It has been reproduced in the best form available to the Pentagon. It is not spiral-bound, but rather assembled with Velobinding in a soft, white linen cover. The Storming Media report number is A949724. The abstra... more »ct provided by the Pentagon follows: In the early 1990s, the Department of the Army abandoned its Skill Qualification Test (SQT) program due primarily to maintenance, development, and administration costs. Cancellation of the SQT program left a void in the Army's capabilities for assessing job performance qualification. To meet this need, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) instituted a 3-year program of feasibility research related to development of a Soldier assessment system that is both effective and affordable. The PerformM21 program has two mutually supporting tracks. The first is a needs analysis that will result in design recommendations and identification of issues related to implementation of a competency assessment program. The second track is a demonstration of concept - starting with a prototype core assessment targeted to all Soldiers eligible for promotion to Sergeant, followed by job-specific prototype assessments for several Military Occupational Specialties. Experience with the prototype assessments will influence elaboration of the operational program design recommendations. The present report describes the needs analysis work and subsequent Army competency assessment program design recommendations as they stand at the end of the first year of the PerformM21 effort. A variety of areas are discussed, including program goals and policies as well as test content, design, development, and administration considerations.« less