In 1996, Cohen made public information he had gathered using the State of Michigan's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) about the substantial weight of racial factors in the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions office use of a "grid system". Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher sued the University based on this data. Barbara Grutter, in a separate proceeding, sued the Law School of the University of Michigan relying on additional data also revealed by Cohen's FOIA inquiry. While the U-M changed its "grid system" to a "point system" the following year, it argued that both mechanical systems were identical in outcome and that the point system, which became more famous, was designed merely to be easier to understand. The system that Cohen made public was ruled unconstitutional by the U. S. Supreme Court [in Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003] as a "mechanical system," although in a separate ruling concerning the U-M Law School [Grutter v. Bollinger, 2003], the limited use of non-mechanical preferences was allowed.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on June 23, 2003, Cohen, Gratz, Grutter, and others were among those who invited Ward Connerly to Michigan, where he appeared in a July 8, 2003 speech on the Michigan campus announcing the formation of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), to forbid preference by race or nationality in the state. This became Proposition 2 (06-2) in Michigan, appearing on the November 8, 2006 ballot. Cohen was a leading spokesperson for Proposition 2 in a heated electoral campaign. Proposition 2 passed by a 58% - 42% margin. As a result of Cohen's involvement in the issue, he has appeared on numerous panels and in media reports on racial preferences since the mid-1990s.

During the years 1964-67 Cohen, then an Associate Prof. of Philosophy, was an active member of the small planning committee for the Residential College of the University of Michigan. He became the principal author of the "Blue Book" which laid the intellectual foundations for the Residential College. When the Residential College opened in 1967 Cohen became a full-time member of its faculty, and his appointment was shifted from the Department of Philosophy to the Residential College, where he remains the only one of that founding group serving as an active member of the Michigan faculty.

In 1998 anonymous donations totaling some $13,000 were made to the University to name a reading room in the Residential College in Cohen's honor. This was done; a plaque honoring him was placed. It was removed shortly afterwards, however, the reason given being "procedural violations." Many in the University believed that Cohen was being discriminated against because of his outspoken and unpopular opposition to the race-conscious admissions system of the University. Senior members of the Law School faculty, and other faculties, who did not agree with Cohen's views on the admissions matter, nevertheless wrote angrily to the President, Lee Bollinger, in the conviction that technical violations of procedure were being arbitrarily invoked against him, and that the reputation of the University had been besmirched. The President agreed to replace the plaque and to reaffirm the name of the Reading Room; Cohen agreed that his own donation of $10,000 to the University for the room be made public.

Cohen is a tenured professor who has been a member of the U-M faculty since 1955. In 2006 the University held a celebration honoring his 50 years on the faculty. He has been a lifetime activist for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), serving as Chair of the Michigan affiliate of the ACLU, and for years as a member of the National Board of Directors of the ACLU.

When the American Nazi Party threatened, in 1978, to march in Skokie, Illinois, Cohen published (in The Nation to which he was a regular contributor) several widely reprinted essays defending the right to present publicly even the most abhorrent political views. [See: "The Extreme Test of Free Speech," The Nation, 15 April 1978] When (as a part of the protest against the war in Viet Nam) efforts were made to forbid research of certain kinds on the U-M campus, Cohen strongly supported the freedom of faculty members to engage in the inquiries that they thought appropriate. During that war Cohen, in active protest, defended selective conscientious objection [See: "The Case for Selective Pacifism," The Nation, 8 July 1968], and defended some, but not all, civil disobedience. [See: "Civil Disobedience and the Law," Rutgers Law Review, Fall, 1966.] When University administrators sought to censor the showing of sexually explicit films on campus, Cohen, then serving as Chair of the University faculty, strongly defended student freedoms before the Regents of the University, with ultimate success. In the mid-1970s, when the fear of misuse led some to oppose the continuation of research in recombinant DNA technology, Cohen defended such research vigorously, both on the Michigan campus and also in The New England Journal of Medicine ["When May Research Be Stopped?" NEJM 26 May 1977.]

Cohen maintains his membership in the ACLU despite his disagreement with the organization's support of race preferences in university admissions. References: open letter from Cohen to Michigan ACLU President Kary Moss.

From 1985 to 1995 a fraction of Cohen's appointment was in the Medical School of the University of Michigan, where he served as Professor of Philosophy and as Director of the Program in Human Values in Medicine. There he served also as a founding member of the Michigan Medical Center's Ethics Committee, as a member of its Animal Care and Use Committee, and for more than 30 years, as a member of its Institutional Review Board (IRB). Cohen's involvement with research on humans led to reflections on the uses of animals in science, which he defends [See: "The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research," New England Journal of Medicine, 2 October 1986]; and on the limited uses of prisoners as research subjects, which he also defends [see: "Medical Experimentation on Prisoners," Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Spring, 1978]; on ethical issues in transplant medicine [See: "Alcoholics and Liver Transplantation," Journal of the American Medical Association, 13 March 1991); and on abortion (See: "How Not to Argue about Abortion, The Michigan Quarterly Review, Fall, 1990).

Having written much about the concept of justice, Cohen became involved, during the 1970s, in the process of Labor/Management arbitration. With the support of the late Prof. William Haber (Economics, U-M), a well-known arbitrator, Cohen became a member of the Labor Panel of the American Arbitration Association, and over the years has issued many arbitration awards in many industries. Cohen remains an active arbitrator for the AAA, and also an Act 312 Arbitrator, and Grievance Arbitrator, for the State of Michigan.

• Carl Cohen. "Haben Tiere Rechte?". Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tierethik (Hrsg.). Tierrechte - Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. Erlangen 2007. ISBN 978-3-89131-417-3

Articles:The Detroit Free Press, p. 13A19 June 1992

The Case for Federalism in Organ Sharingpublished by the Transplant Policy Center, Ann Arbor, MI1987

A Critique of the Alleged Moral Basis of VegetarianismFood for Thought2004

A Very Bad CompromiseThe Journal of Blacks in Higher EducationSpring, 1997

About Personal Consequences in the Academy When a Professor Opposes Racial PreferencesJournal of Blacks in Higher Education, no. 34Winter, 2002

Accusations of RacismThe University Record, Ann Arbor26 April 1993

Affirmative Action and DiversityCommentary, Volume 117, No. 1January 2004

Affirmative Action and Racial Preference at the University of MichiganDeclining Standards at Michigan Public Universities, The Mackinac Center for Public PolicyFebruary 1997

Affirmative Action and the Rights of the MajorityMinorities, Charles Fried, ed., Dahlem Konferenzen Springer Verlag, N.Y., Tokyo, Berlin1983

Affirmative Action in Medical School AdmissionsTroubling Problems in Medical Ethics , Alan R. Liss, N.Y.,1981

Alcoholics and Liver TransplantationJournal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 265, No. 10, pp. 1299-130113 March 1991

An Ethical Perspective on Animal ResearchJournal of the American Veterinary Association, Vol. 206, No. 415 February 1995

Anencephalic Infants as Sources of Transplantable OrgansHastings Center Report, pp. 28-30October/November 1988

Animal Experimentation DefendedThe Importance of Animal Experimentation for Safety and Biomedical Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 7-161990

Citizenship and Obedience: Tangled ObligationsThe Nation, Vol. 211, No. 9September 28, 1970

Civil Disobedience and the LawRutgers Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 1Fall 1966

Civil Disobedience: Moral or Not?The Nation, Vol. 207, No. 19December 2, 1968

Concerning Hopwood: A Reply to My CriticsCommentary, Vol. 102, No. 2August 1996

Conscientious ObjectionEthics, Vol. 78, No. 4July 1968

Criminal Responsibility and the Knowledge of Right and WrongUniversity of Miami Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1Fall 1959

Democracy and Its Economic ConditionsProceedings, Thirteenth International Congress of Philosophy, Mexico City1963

Democracy and the CurriculumThe Nation, Vol. 208, No. 11March 17, 1969

Democracy in IsraelThe Nation, Vol. 219, No. 2July 20, 1974

Discrimination and Reverse DiscriminationLaw and Philosophy, Vol. 5, p. 1351986

Divestiture and ApartheidLSA Magazine, Vol. 3, No. 2, Ann ArborWinter 1980

Do Animals Have Rights?Ethics and Behavior, Harvard University, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 91-1021997

Equality, Diversity, and Good FaithWayne Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 4July 1980

Ethical Aspects of Animal Researchin The Role of the Chimpanzee in Research G. Eder, E. Kaiser, and F.A. King, eds., Karger Pub.. Basel1994

Ethnic Justice, Individual RightsThe Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. XII, No. 1March 1, 1976

Fairness in HousingTestimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate; published in Hearings on the Fair Housing Amendments Act, Washington, D.C., 1979, pp. 458-495 Washington, D.C.,September 17, 1979

Fears of Human Cloning are Without MeritThe Detroit News4 March 1998

Free Speech and Political Extremism: How Nasty Are We Free To Be?Law and Philosophy 7, pp. 263-2791989

Honorable Ends, Unsavory Means: Preferential Admission in Higher EducationCivil Liberties Review, Vol. 2, No. 2,Spring 1975

How Much Democracy for the University?The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. XI, No. 5October 14, 1975

How Not to Argue about AbortionMichigan Quarterly Review, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 567-583Fall, 1990

How Should We Decide Who Should Decide What Comes Before What?Ethical Theory and Business, Beauchamp & Bowie, eds., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs1979

Introduction to John Dewey, The Middle Works, 1899-1924 Volume 15: 1923-1924J. A. Boydston, ed., So. Illinois University Press, Carbondale1983

Is Affirmative Action on the Way Out?Commentary, Vol. 195, No. 3March 1998

Justice Debased: The Weber DecisionCommentary, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 43-53September 1979

Law, Speech, and DisobedienceThe Nation, Vol. 202, No. 13March 28, 1966

Medical Experimentation on PrisonersPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 3,Spring 1978

Militant Morality: Civil Disobedience and BioethicsHastings Center Report, Vol 19, No. 6November 1989

Moral Issues in Medical Experimentation on HumansPhilosophic Exchange, Vol. 2, No. 5; Center for Philosophic Exchange, State University of New York at Brockport, N.Y.,Summer 1979

Naked Racial PreferenceCommentary, Vol. 81, No. 3March 1986

Natural and Non-Natural QualitiesThe Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 55, No. 10May 8, 1958

Naturalism and the Method of VerstehenThe Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 51, No. 7April 1, 1954

On The Child's Status in the Democratic StatePolitical Theory, Vol. 3, No. 4November 1975

On the Ethics of InstitutionsEthics and the Campus, B'nai B'rith Hillel Foundation, Washington D.C.,1991

On the Quality of LifeCirculation, Vol. 66, No. 5; American Heart Association Monograph No. 92November 1982

On the Right of the Patient to KnowEthics, Humanism, and Medicine, M.D. Basson, ed., Alan R. Liss, Inc., N.Y.1980

Philosophical Issues in Regulating BiotechnologyTestimony in Proceedings of the Subcommittee on Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives6 December 1991

Philosophical Reflections on the Impact of Coronary Artery Surgery on Patients' Quality of LifeQuality of Life and Cardiovascular Care Vol. 1, No. 5;May 1985

Philosophy and Public PolicyWorking Papers The Rockefeller Foundation New York1980

Political Controversy and the UniversityPublic Policy in the 1980s, Southern University Conference Proceedings, N. R. Berte, ed., Savannah1980

Politically Correct LanguageThe Detroit News, p. 15A14 November 1991

Preference by Race in University Admissions and the Quest for DiversityThe Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, Vol 54, 1998, Washington University School of Law1998

Preference by Race is Neither Just nor WisePhilosophic Exchange, State University of New York at Brockport1998

Private Groups vs. Social Justice: The Freedom to be BadThe Nation, Vol. 216, No. 4January 22, 1973

Procreation After Death or Mental IncompetenceFertility and Sterility, Vol. 66, No. 6December 1996

Punishment by ConscriptionThe Nation, Vol. 201, No. 22December 27, 1965

Race and Equal Protection of the LawsLincoln Law Review, Vol. X, No. 2Fall 1977

Race and the ConstitutionThe Nation, Vol. 220, No. 5February 8, 1975

Race in University AdmissionsThe University of Michigan Record, Vol. 52, No. 225 February 1997

Race Preference and the Universities - A Final Reckoning?Commentary, Vol. 112, No.2September 2001

Race, Lies, and HopwoodCommentary, Vol. 101, No. 6June 1996

Racial Preference is DynamiteThe Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. XIV, No. 10May 2, 1977

Revolution and Copernican RevolutionsScience and Society, N. H. Steneck, ed., University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor1975

Sex, Birth Control, and Human LifeEthics, Vol. 79, No. 4July 1969

Some Implications of ControlBiological Influents in Mental Health Michigan Department of Mental Health1962

Technology and Political Freedomin Technology and Freedom, Alfred Sloan Foundation, Davidson, N.C.March 1985

Testimony before the U.S. House of RepresentativesJune-July 1996

The Abuse of Morality: How Not to be GoodMoral Values in Contemporary Public Life, Marquette University, Milwaukee1975

The Case Against Group LibelThe Nation, Vol. 226, No. 24June 24, 1978

The Case for Presumed Consent to Transplant Human Organs After DeathTransplantation Proceedings, Vol. 24, No. 5 pp. 2168-2172October 1992

The Case for Selective PacifismThe Nation, Vol. 207, No. 1July 8, 1968

The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine 315: 865-870October 2, 1986

The Corruption that Is Group PreferenceAcademic QuestionsSummer 1998

The Dangers of Inquiry and the Burden of ProofSouthern California Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1081-1113September 1978

The Equal Protection of the LawsThe Detroit News28 December 1997

The Ethics of Civil DisobedienceThe Nation, vol. 198, No. 12March 16, 1964

The Extreme Test of Free SpeechThe Nation, Vol. 226, No. 14April 15, 1978

The Health of the American Democratic SystemProceedings, National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council, New YorkJune 1974

The Justification of DemocracyThe Monist, Vol. 55, No. 1January 1971

The Morality of TransplantationJournal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 266, No. 2, pp. 213-21410 July 1991

The Penalty of PreferenceThe Michigan Daily, Ann Arbor23 October 1992

The Poverty of a DialogueProblems of Communism, vol. XIIISept.-Oct. 1964

The Right of PrivacyThe Nation, Vol. 212, No. 8February 22, 1971

The ROTC and the UniversityThe Michigan Alumnus, Ann ArborSeptember 1979

The Uses of Race in Admission under Regents v. BakkeThe Journal of Law in Society, volume 1, no. 1, Wayne State University Law School, DetroitWinter, 1999

The Village of Skokie vs. Carl Cohen: An ExchangeThe Nation, Vol. 226, No. 17May 6, 1978

Three Tests for an ElectorateThe New York Times (Op-Ed)November 4, 1970

Treating Animals Humanely; Obligations, Not RightsThe National Law Journal12 August 2002

Universities Abuse Admissions PowersThe Detroit News, Op-Ed31 March 1996

University Policy on Discriminatory HarassmentThe University Record, Ann Arbor9 November 1992

What is the Difference between an HIV and a CBC?Hastings Center Report, pp. 18-20August/September 1988

What Transplantation Can Teach Us about Health Care ReformThe New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 330: 858-624 March 1994

What, in Our House?The Nation, Vol. 217, No. 21December 17, 1973

When May Research Be Stopped?The New England Journal of Medicine, 296:1203-1210May 26, 1977

Which Way is Left?The Yale Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 4Summer 1969

Who Are Equals?The National Forum, Vol. 58, No 1Winter 1978

Who's to the Left? What's to the Right?Rackham Reports, Graduate School of Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Vol. 9, No. 1Spring 1983

Why Racial Preference is Illegal and ImmoralCommentary, Vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 40-52June 1979

Winks, Nods, Disguises - and Racial PreferenceCommentary, Volume 116, No. 2September 2003

Books:Affirmative Action and Racial PreferenceOxford University Press, NY and London2003

Civil Disobedience: Conscience, Tactics, and the LawColumbia University Press, N.Y1971

Communism, Fascism and Democracy: The Theoretical FoundationsMcGraw-Hill, N.Y1997

DemocracyUniversity of Georgia Press, Athens, 1971 The Free Press, Macmillan, N.Y., 19731971,73

Four SystemsRandom House, N.Y.,1982

Introduction to LogicPrentice-Hall, New York, London2004

Introduction to LogicPrentice-Hall, New York, London2001

Naked Racial Preference:The Case Against Affirmative ActionMadison Books, Rowman and Littlefield NY, London1995

On Rule by the PeopleBeijing, The Commercial Press2004

The Animal Rights DebateRowman & Littlefield, NY, London2001