Skip to main content
PBS logo
 
 

Search - Game of Queens: The Women Who Made Sixteenth-Century Europe

Game of Queens: The Women Who Made Sixteenth-Century Europe
Game of Queens The Women Who Made SixteenthCentury Europe
Author: Sarah Gristwood
Sixteenth-century Europe saw an explosion of female rule. From Isabella of Castile and her granddaughter Mary Tudor, to Catherine de Medici, Anne Boleyn, and Elizabeth Tudor, women wielded enormous power over their territories for more than a hundred years.  — In the sixteenth century, as in our own, the phenomenon of the powerful woman offe...  more »
ISBN-13: 9781780749945
ISBN-10: 1780749945
Publication Date: 10/6/2016
Pages: 416
Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
 1

3 stars, based on 1 rating
Publisher: Oneworld Publications
Book Type: Hardcover
Other Versions: Paperback
Members Wishing: 1
Reviews: Member | Amazon | Write a Review
Read All 1 Book Reviews of "Game of Queens The Women Who Made SixteenthCentury Europe"

Please Log in to Rate these Book Reviews

maura853 avatar reviewed Game of Queens: The Women Who Made Sixteenth-Century Europe on + 542 more book reviews
Fascinating subjects, disappointing execution.

An overstated thesis and, in my opinion, poor organization made this a disappointing and frustrating read. I never really "bought" Gristwood's thesis that these "women who made 16th century Europe" represented a trend or a type. The women she writes about are fascinating, and I've very glad to have learned more about them, but efforts to shoehorn them into a "Game of Queens" metaphor ignores their crucial differences -- and even, you could argue, what made each one unique. There are Queens Regnant, Queens Consort, Regents (official and unofficial), powers behind the throne, even a couple of mistresses. There are wise women, and foolish women, victims and villain(esse)s. What there is not is anything that persuades me that this was more than an accident of history that meant that a number of women (capable and not-so-capable) found themselves in the right (or wrong) place at the right (or wrong) time.

Gristwood's decision to tell a complicated, multi-region story chronologically was, I think, a mistake. It isn't her fault that so many of her subjects were named Mary or Margaret (or, for the guys, Henry or Francois ...) but the way she bounces from place to place, and skids from year to year just make it so much harder to follow each one, as an individual. Important events happen, but their repercussions aren't felt for several chapters. (OR are felt again and again and again: I was convinced that King Ferdinand of Aragon died about three times ...) Individuals disappear from one sequence of events, only to pop up again somewhere else. In early chapters, as Gristwood tries to establish her "sisterhood" of ruling women, she relies a lot on 20/20 foresight, attempting to create deep connections where there really aren't any through the liberal use of "little did she know": "little did she know that one day she would face her one-time playmate ..." Well, she didn't know, did she, so how does it really matter?

These are, however, truly fascinating women, and it's really enlightening to have a book in which they are center stage, rather than taking walk-on parts in the lives and careers of their fathers, husbands, brothers or sons. I just wish they had been given a better-organized book.


Genres: